The most common reasons NDIA planners return or reject allied health reports, and what you can do to avoid each one.
A rejected NDIS report wastes your time, delays the participant's plan review, and often results in a worse outcome. The planner sends it back, you rewrite sections, the review gets pushed back by weeks, and the participant's funding gap grows. Most of this is preventable.
The NDIA does not publish a formal list of rejection reasons. But the same issues appear in practitioner forums, plan manager feedback, and support coordinator complaints over and over. Here are the most common problems and how to fix them before you submit.
It sounds basic but it is the most common return reason. A transposed digit in the NDIS participant number. A name that does not match the plan (maiden name vs married name, preferred name vs legal name). A missing date of birth. These cause administrative delays because the planner cannot match the report to the participant's file. Before writing anything else, open the participant's current NDIS plan and verify: full legal name, NDIS participant number, date of birth, and current plan dates. Copy them directly. Do not type from memory.
This is the rejection reason that actually affects funding. 'Participant has made good progress' does not tell the planner whether the goal was achieved, partially achieved, or barely started. 'Participant has improved' gives no baseline, no measurement, and no functional description. The planner needs to know what the participant can do now that they could not do before. Compare: 'Has shown improvement in self-care' versus 'Can now shower independently with verbal cues only, compared to requiring full physical assistance at the start of the period.' The second version tells the planner exactly what changed. Write every goal progress section that way.
If the participant's plan has five funded goals and your report covers four, it will likely be returned. Planners review the entire plan. A missing goal creates a gap in the evidence. Write a progress block for every funded goal, including goals not yet commenced. If you have not started a goal, say so and explain why: waitlist for a specific service, prerequisites not yet met, the participant's circumstances changed. 'Not yet commenced due to hospitalisation in March and April' is a valid explanation.
'Continued OT is recommended' is not a recommendation the NDIA can act on. The planner cannot fund 'continued OT' because they do not know how many hours, at what frequency, under which support category. Every recommendation needs: the support type, the session frequency, the total hours per year, and the NDIS support category with line item code. 'Continued OT' becomes '26 hours of individual occupational therapy per year (fortnightly 60-minute sessions) under Improved Daily Living (07_004_0118_6_3), focused on community access skills and public transport training.' The second version can be funded directly.
Clinical opinion alone carries less weight than validated assessment results. Planners are trained to look for standardised scores because they provide objective, comparable evidence. If standardised tools exist for your discipline and are appropriate for the participant, use them and report the results. Always include the tool name, version, date, scores, and a plain-language interpretation. If standardised tools are not appropriate for a particular participant (non-verbal, very young, significant intellectual disability affecting test engagement), explain why and describe your informal assessment methodology in detail.
This is subtler but increasingly important after the October 2024 Act amendments. The NDIA funds disability-related functional limitation. If your report describes functional difficulties without explicitly connecting them to the participant's disability, the planner cannot justify the funding under Section 34. 'Participant has difficulty cooking meals' is a functional observation. 'Participant has difficulty cooking meals due to impaired executive function and bilateral upper limb weakness secondary to cerebral palsy' connects the function to the disability. The second version answers the reasonable and necessary test implicitly.
Every NDIS report must include the treating practitioner's full name, qualifications, AHPRA registration number (or ESSA number for exercise physiologists), and the clinic's NDIS provider number. Missing credentials are a straightforward return reason. The practitioner who signs the report must be the one who delivered the services. If a student or registrar delivered some sessions under supervision, name them, state their registration status, and confirm the supervision arrangement.
A report with no headings, inconsistent formatting, or dense unbroken paragraphs takes longer to process. Planners reviewing dozens of reports per day will spend less time on a report they have to work hard to read. Use clear section headings. Number your pages. Include a header with the participant's name and NDIS number on every page. Use consistent formatting throughout. Submit as PDF to prevent formatting from breaking between systems.
Assessment results from two or three years ago do not reflect the participant's current function. Planners expect recent evidence. For most disciplines, assessments conducted within the current plan period (last 12-24 months) are considered current. If your most recent standardised assessment is older than that, consider whether a reassessment is warranted before the plan review. If reassessment is not possible (participant is unwell, assessment tools not available), explain why in the report and note the date of the most recent results.
Use a pre-submission checklist
Check: every goal addressed, participant details match the plan, recommendations quantified with line items, credentials included, declaration signed and dated. Two minutes of checking prevents two weeks of delay.
Write for the planner, not the clinician
The person reading your report is not an allied health professional. They process hundreds of reports. Plain language, clear structure, and explicit links between disability, function, and recommendations make their job easier and your report more effective.
Keep a copy of every participant's plan
Quote goals word for word from the plan. Paraphrasing creates mismatches that trigger queries. If you cannot find the plan, ask the support coordinator or plan manager for a copy before you start writing.
Track plan review dates proactively
Do not wait for the support coordinator to remind you. Track review dates in your practice management system and start writing at least four weeks before the due date. Late reports miss the review window entirely.
Set up your clinic in under 2 minutes. No credit card required.
Or email us at support@secondshift.com.au to book a personal onboarding call.